Premise 1
If there is any truth, the truth exists, known or unknown - potentially discoverable.
Premise 2
Whether someone discovers the truth or not does not render the truth any less
true.
Premise 3
An inability to discover facts that constitute truth does not render someone immune from "ideological neutrality" because their awareness of fact(s), either via wilful ignorance or omission of discovery, does not change the truth.
Premise 4
The truth, when arrived at, supersedes untruth.
Premise 5
A superseding of untruth means truth is supreme.
Premise 6
Truth being supreme means that the law of non-contradiction instantiates the dichotomy between true and untrue.
Premise 7
The dichotomy between true and untrue negates the plausibility or possibility of legitimate bias.
Argument
The quest for truth is a foundational pursuit of human understanding. Premise 1 posits that truth, whether known or hidden, is inherent and potentially accessible. This implies that an objective reality exists independently of our awareness. Whether or not we uncover the truth does not alter its existence, as noted in Premise 2.
Premise 3 delves into the idea that our inability to discover certain truths does not excuse us from the concept of "ideological neutrality." In other words, even if we are unaware of specific facts, our lack of awareness does not change the reality of those facts. This underscores the idea that truth exists independently of our knowledge or perspective.
When we arrive at the truth, as Premise 4 suggests, it triumphs over untruth.
As explained in Premise 5, this notion highlights the supremacy of truth. When falsehoods are dispelled, they are replaced by facts that reflect the genuine state of affairs. This brings us to the pivotal point that truth is supreme—the bedrock upon which accurate understanding is built.
Premise 6 introduces the law of non-contradiction, a fundamental principle in logic. This law asserts that contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense and simultaneously. Therefore, if truth is supreme, it inherently adheres to the law of non-contradiction. This establishes an apparent dichotomy between what is true and untrue, further solidifying the concept of objective reality.
Finally, Premise 7 asserts that this dichotomy between true and untrue effectively eliminates bias. Bias arises from favouring one perspective over another regardless of objective truth. However, bias finds no room to thrive if the truth is understood as supreme and guided by the law of non-contradiction. By its nature, bias operates in the realm of subjective interpretation, whereas the supremacy of truth is rooted in the objective realm.
These premises may weave together a coherent argument that underscores the significance of truth in human understanding. From the potential discoverability of truth to its intrinsic supremacy and from the elimination of bias to the establishment of an objective dichotomy between truth and untruth, the argument highlights truth's foundational role in shaping our perception of reality.
