top of page

Hitchens' Critiques Implored By Leftists (Sometimes)

Writer's picture: Luke GirkeLuke Girke

Christopher Hitchens, a well-known British-American author, journalist, and intellectual, underwent a significant political evolution throughout his life. He began his political journey as a Marxist in his youth but gradually distanced himself from Marxism as he grew older. His disavowal of Marxism and his separation from it can be traced to various points in his life and career.


One of the significant turning points in Hitchens' political evolution was his disillusionment with Marxism during the 1980s. He became critical of the authoritarian and repressive regimes in countries like Cuba and the Soviet Union, which claimed to be implementing Marxist ideologies. Hitchens was particularly vocal in his criticism of the Iranian regime and its treatment of dissidents.


Hitchens' break from Marxism became apparent as he embraced a more liberal and humanist worldview. He became a proponent of secularism, free expression, and individual rights. His book "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything" exemplifies his shift towards atheism and his critique of religious beliefs.


It is important to note that Hitchens did not wholly disavow all of his leftist or socialist beliefs. He continued criticising right-wing policies and imperialism while aligning himself with certain left-of-centre positions. However, he distanced himself from Marxism's dogmatic and authoritarian aspects and became known for his strong defence of liberal values.


In summary, Christopher Hitchens began to disavow his Marxism and separate himself during the 1980s, primarily due to his disillusionment with the authoritarian regimes claiming to represent Marxist ideals and his embrace of liberal and humanist values. His political evolution continued throughout his life, and he remained a complex and multifaceted intellectual with various political views.


It is worth noting that Christopher Hitchens' political evolution was somewhat unusual in that he moved away from Marxism, a traditionally secular ideology, and became a staunch critic of organised religion. While it is a common stereotype that anti-Marxists tend to be more sympathetic to religious beliefs, Hitchens was a notable exception. His critique of religion and advocacy for atheism were integral to his later intellectual pursuits, even as he distanced himself from Marxism. Hitchens' unique perspective demonstrated that political and philosophical positions are not always neatly aligned along a single ideological spectrum, highlighting the complexity of individual beliefs and the diversity of thought within political and intellectual discourse.




© 2025 The Girke Group Melbourne. 

Website Designed by Luke Girke in collaboration with The Girke Group Management.



Website

The information provided by The Girke Group (‘we’, ‘us’, or ‘our’) on http://www.girke.com.au (the ‘Site’) and our mobile application is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site and our mobile application is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site our or mobile application. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THE SITE OR OUR MOBILE APPLICATION OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE AND OUR APPLICATION. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND OUR MOBILE APPLICATION AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE AND OUR MOBILE APPLICATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. 

 

Professional Liability

The Site cannot and does not contain medical/health, legal, and fitness advice. The medical/health, legal, and fitness information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We not provide any kind of medical/health, legal, and fitness advice. THE USE OR RELIANCE OF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE SITE OR OUR MOBILE APPLICATION IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. 

 

Testimonials  

The Site may contain testimonials by users of our products and/or services. These testimonials reflect the real-life experiences and opinions of such users. However, the experiences are personal to those particular users, and may not necessarily be representative of all users of our products and/or services. We do not claim, and you should not assume, that all users will have the same experiences. YOUR INDIVIDUAL RESULTS MAY VARY.  The testimonials on the Site are submitted in various forms such as text, audio, and/or video, and are reviewed by us before being posted. They appear on the Site verbatim as given by the users, except for the correction of grammar or typing errors. Some testimonials may have been shortened for the sake of brevity where the full testimonial contained extraneous information not relevant to the general public. The views and opinions contained in the testimonials belong solely to the individual user and do not reflect our views and opinions. We are not affiliated with users who provide testimonials, and users are not paid or otherwise compensated for their testimonials.

Blog

Articles on this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any diseases. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have not evaluated these articles. All information available on the website and blog is for educational purposes only. A qualified healthcare professional should be consulted before implementing any fitness, health, or nutritional protocol provided in the blog. Additionally, the articles containing material related to the law, legalities, or the legal profession are exploratory only and are not legal advice.
 

bottom of page