Moderatism, often likened to "cowardly fence-sitting," has been scrutinised by several influential scholars, each offering a distinct perspective on its shortcomings. Celebrated for his acumen and contrarian stance, Christopher Hitchens decried moderates for their purported lack of moral clarity and propensity to equivocate on crucial issues. He contended that moderates, particularly in the face of moral urgency concerning war, religion, or political ideology, often refrained from taking principled stands, characterising moderation as a manifestation of moral timidity. Hitchens' critiques of this disposition were prominently evident in his writings and speeches, notably in the context of the Iraq War and religious faith.
Noam Chomsky, renowned for his critique of liberal democracies, scrutinised moderate positions within these systems, particularly within media and propaganda. He introduced the concept of "manufactured consent" to elucidate how mainstream media, often adopting moderate positions, can mould public opinion and stifle dissent. Chomsky posited that moderates inadvertently perpetuate prevailing power structures and economic inequalities by not challenging them. According to him, genuine progress frequently necessitates radical and activist approaches, a departure from the confines of moderation.
Slavoj Žižek, in contrast, directed his criticism of moderates towards their perceived complacency and the false sense of security they engender. Žižek maintained that moderation often deters individuals from confronting pressing societal and political issues head-on. He posited that authentic transformation arises from addressing the fundamental contradictions within society rather than settling for moderate compromises.
Michel Foucault's critiques of moderation were inextricably entwined with his exploration of power dynamics. Foucault contended that those in authority can use moderation as a tool to uphold their control. His work illuminated how dominant ideologies could co-opt moderate voices, thereby effectively stifling dissenting voices.
Cornel West's criticism of moderates, notably in combatting systemic racism and inequality, centred on their perceived caution and excessive willingness to compromise. West asserted that moderation could impede progress by its tendency to yield too readily. He advocated a more confrontational and justice-oriented approach when addressing complex social issues.
Milton Friedman, the Nobel laureate economist, scrutinised moderate economic policies, anchoring his critique in his staunch belief in the efficacy of free-market capitalism. Friedman argued that moderates advocating for interventionist economic policies might inadvertently precipitate adverse consequences, such as government overreach and the curtailment of individual liberty. In his view, economic moderation could hinder economic growth and innovation.
Ayn Rand's rejection of moderatism emanated from her Objectivist philosophy, which champions individualism and capitalism. Rand criticised moderates for their willingness to compromise on fundamental principles and staunchly advocated unwavering adherence to laissez-faire capitalism. In her perspective, moderates who compromised on economic principles risked eroding individual rights and freedoms.
