In strength training, training to failure has long been a topic of discussion and debate among fitness enthusiasts, athletes, and researchers alike. The idea of pushing one's limits to achieve optimal muscle growth and strength gains has led to exploring various training methodologies, each targeting different aspects of muscle contraction. This article delves into the differences between isometric, concentric, and eccentric failure, drawing upon scientific studies to shed light on their unique effects on muscle development and overall performance.
Isometric Failure: Holding Steady
Isometric contractions involve static muscle contractions where the muscle length remains constant while tension builds within the fibres. Training for isometric failure requires holding a specific position against an immovable force until the muscle can no longer maintain the contraction. Research by Wernbom et al. (2007) examined the effects of isometric training on failure in muscle hypertrophy. The study found that while isometric training induced significant strength gains, it did not elicit the same muscle growth as concentric or eccentric training.
Study: Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomeé R. The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Medicine, 2007.
Concentric Failure: Lifting Against Gravity
Concentric contractions involve muscle shortening as they generate force against resistance. Training to concentric failure occurs when a lifter cannot complete the lifting phase of a movement due to muscle fatigue. Burd et al. (2010) compared the effects of concentric and eccentric resistance training on muscle protein synthesis. The results indicated that while both training methods contributed to muscle growth, eccentric contractions demonstrated higher protein synthesis.
Study: Burd NA, Holwerda AM, Selby KC, et al. Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men—The Journal of Physiology, 2010.
Eccentric Failure: The Controlled Descent
Eccentric contractions involve muscle lengthening while under tension, often during the lowering phase of a movement. Training for eccentric failure entails extending a muscle beyond its capacity to control the descent, often leading to muscle soreness. A study by Hortobágyi et al. (1996) explored eccentric training to failure and its impact on muscle strength. The findings highlighted that eccentric training was particularly effective in enhancing muscle strength compared to traditional concentric training.
Study: Hortobágyi T, Hill JP, Houmard JA, Fraser DD, Lambert NJ, Israel RG. Adaptive responses to muscle lengthening and shortening in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1996.
Balancing Intensity and Recovery
While training to fail in any of these contraction types can stimulate muscle growth and strength gains, it is essential to strike a balance between intensity and recovery. Overtraining, especially when consistently pushing to failure, can increase the risk of injury and burnout. Employing periodisation techniques, where training intensity and volume are strategically varied, can provide the body with the necessary recovery time to adapt and grow.
Training To Failure: All Kinds!
Training to failure has its merits in promoting muscle growth and strength enhancement. Isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions offer distinct pathways to achieving these goals. While isometric training can contribute to strength gains, it might not induce as much muscle growth as other methods. Concentric and eccentric training both have their advantages, with eccentric training potentially yielding more remarkable muscle protein synthesis and strength improvements. Ultimately, a well-rounded training program that incorporates a variety of contraction types while considering recovery periods can lead to optimal results without sacrificing safety and long-term progress.
